For AI-assisted engineering teams

Your codebase context.
Always alive. Always ready.

Every agent session starts blind. Before it's useful, someone has to manually reload context — re-reading files, re-explaining architecture, re-establishing what's been tried. That's 10–15 minutes of overhead, every session, every engineer, every day.

Parker is built to solve that. We ingest your GitHub, Slack, and Linear and build a persistent model of your codebase and team — so agents start with context instead of asking for it.

Before
$ claude
— manually re-read stripe.ts
— explain payment conventions
— who reviewed PR #847?
— what changed last week?
~12 min before agent is useful
With Parker
$ claude
owner: Alex Rivera
convention: wrap in withRetry()
recent: v2→v3 migration (PR #847)
reviewer: Sarah Chen
context loading: handled
npm
npm install -g @parker/cli

Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent

10–15 minof overhead per session
GitHub · Slack · Linear
< 5 minto first insight

The problem

The problem has two layers.

AI made your engineers more capable. It didn't solve the context problem — it made it worse.

Layer 1

Every agent session starts from zero.

You've invested in Cursor and Claude Code. Your engineers are running sessions all day — maybe 4 or 5 at a time. The agents are capable. But every session starts blind.

  • 10–15 min reloading context before every session
  • CLAUDE.md maintained by hand — stale within days
  • 20 engineers × 10 sessions/day = thousands of dead minutes
  • Agent guesses at ownership, conventions, and recent changes
Layer 2

Your team knowledge lives in one person's head.

Past 15 engineers, the mental model a great CTO carries — who owns what, who built it and why, who to pull at 2am — stops fitting. When someone leaves, you find out three weeks later what they knew.

  • Key engineer leaves — critical knowledge evaporates
  • New hires spend months on Slack archaeology
  • Staffing decisions default to gut feel, not expertise signals
  • Incidents: “Who built this service again?”

AI coding tools are making both problems worse. Engineers are shipping more code faster, written by fewer people who fully understand it. The gap between what the code does and what the humans around it know is widening.

Agent integration

The context layer your agents query directly

Parker runs as an MCP server your agents call mid-session — not a dashboard you check after. One command to connect Claude Code, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible agent.

parker context
Agent knows the file before touching it

Owner, conventions, recent changes, and active reviewers for any file or directory. Your agent writes code that fits before it writes a line.

parker who
Agent finds the right person, not the loudest one

Need to touch the rate limiter? Parker surfaces who actually owns that code — with evidence from git, Slack, and Linear — not just whoever's top of mind.

parker review
Reviews grounded in real team patterns

Feedback based on the conventions of the engineers who own that area. Catches the issues a generic linter never would.

parker mcp
Continuously updated. Nothing to maintain.

Profiles are rebuilt from live GitHub, Slack, and Linear activity. No markdown files to keep in sync. No manual updates. Context stays grounded in what's actually happening.

1. Install

Set up the CLI

One command. Works on macOS and Linux, with any git-based project.

$ curl -fsSL https://parker.team/install.sh | bash

Prefer npm? npm install -g @parker/cli

2. Connect

Works with any agent

MCP server for Claude Code and Cursor today. Context also available as CLI commands and auto-generated context files — no matter how your agents consume it.

AgentStatus
Claude Code
Supported
Cursor
Supported
Any MCP client
Supported
GitHub Copilot
Coming soon
Windsurf
Coming soon

As your team scales

The same layer. A second kind of value.

The intelligence that makes your agents faster is the same intelligence that keeps your org from flying blind as you grow. Same data pipeline. Same profiles. One layer that compounds.

The context that made your agent productive — who owns the payments module, what conventions exist, what's changed and why — is exactly the context that used to live in the CTO's head. Parker makes it persistent, queryable, and available to everyone on the team.

parker who kafka

Right person, with citations.

Not whoever's top of mind — the engineer with 142 commits to kafka/, active in #kafka-platform, who authored KafkaProducer.

parker week

Status update from your actual activity.

Commits, PRs merged, reviews given, tickets closed — reconstructed automatically. Ready to paste into your 1:1 or standup.

parker prep 1on1

Talking points before you walk in.

Wins, in-progress work, and the patterns worth discussing — pulled from real activity, not from memory.

For you, the CTO

Knowledge distribution

Bus factor risks, review load, and who actually knows what — surfaced weekly so you're never surprised by a departure.

Onboarding that actually works

New engineers arrive to a team model that's already accurate — who to ask, what conventions exist, why things are built the way they are.

Expertise signals when you need them

Staffing decisions grounded in who has the relevant depth — not just who's available or loudest in the room.

See it in action

What your agents — and engineers — can query

Parker exposes team intelligence through an MCP server your agents call directly, and a CLI for engineers. The same context, available everywhere.

~/acme-corp
$ parker who kafka
Top experts for "kafka"
1. Sarah Chen — 94% confidence
142 commits to kafka/, authored KafkaProducer, active in #kafka-platform
2. Marcus Johnson — 71% confidence
38 commits, reviewed 23 Kafka PRs, Jira: KAFKA-* assignee
3. Priya Patel — 45% confidence
12 commits, active in #kafka-platform discussions